OverviewProblemInnovationPhysicsBuildResultsSlidesNext steps
Grating-Coupled SPR · Water Quality Sensing · Choi Lab, UNT

DISCSPR

Optical discs as plasmonic sensors. We turned the nanoscale grooves inside everyday Blu-ray, DVD, and CD discs into fully functional Surface Plasmon Resonance chips — for under $10 each.

DiscSPR — Key Numbers
~$200Full apparatus
<$10Per sensor unit
394nm/RIU peak sensitivity
3Disc types tested
DiscSPR sensor module
485,000 deaths per year from contaminated water Lead detected at 50× WHO limit in some regions Atrazine found in 90% of US water samples Current SPR systems: $50,000–$200,000 PFAS detected in 45% of US tap water 2 billion people lack safe drinking water DiscSPR material cost: under $10 per sensor Arsenic poisoning affects 140 million+ people ICP-MS testing: $200–$500 per sample BD-R groove spacing: 322 nm — factory-made precision 485,000 deaths per year from contaminated water Lead detected at 50× WHO limit in some regions Atrazine found in 90% of US water samples Current SPR systems: $50,000–$200,000 PFAS detected in 45% of US tap water 2 billion people lack safe drinking water DiscSPR material cost: under $10 per sensor Arsenic poisoning affects 140 million+ people ICP-MS testing: $200–$500 per sample BD-R groove spacing: 322 nm — factory-made precision
Choose a path

Explore it like a site, not a paper.

01Why it mattersWater testing gap + contaminant context. 02The ideaHow a disc becomes a sensor chip. 03How it sensesInteractive binding + SPR response. 04What workedCompare BD-R, DVD-R, and CD-R.
At a Glance
The project in six numbers
Sensor cost
Under $10
Per disc sensor unit vs. $200+ commercial
Full apparatus
~$200
Complete optical system with flow cell
Best sensitivity
394 nm/RIU
CD-R, Ag coating, R² = 0.990
Sharpest dip
BD-R Ag
321 nm/RIU, best resonance quality
Validation
RCWA
Simulations from AFM-measured geometry
Innovation
No nanofab
Mass-produced disc gratings replace custom chips
Start here

The idea in one screen

DiscSPR asks: can a cheap optical disc replace the expensive nanostructured chip inside a Surface Plasmon Resonance sensor? The answer is yes. The grooves already manufactured into BD-R, DVD-R, and CD-R discs act as the precision grating needed for grating-coupled SPR — after a thin silver film is added.

The key point isn't "we used a CD." It's that commercial discs provide factory-made nanoscale gratings, eliminating the cost and complexity of custom lithography while preserving all the physics needed for label-free optical sensing.

01 Problem
Water testing costs too much
High-quality testing requires $50k–200k instruments in centralized labs.
02 Insight
Discs are already nano-gratings
Those grooves supply the momentum needed for grating-coupled SPR.
03 Build
Cut, clean, coat, measure
Disc pieces cleaned, sputter-coated Ag/Cu, mounted in a 3D-printed flow cell.
04 Result
Low-cost SPR works
CD-R = highest sensitivity; Ag BD-R = sharpest resonance. Both validated by RCWA.
Project snapshot
Novelty
Repurposes mass-produced disc gratings as SPR substrates — no custom nanofabrication.
Core physics
Grooves provide the missing momentum term to excite surface plasmon polaritons.
Best chip
Ag-coated BD-R for sharp dips; CD-R for maximum wavelength shift.
Evidence
AFM measured grating geometry; reflectance data showed RI-dependent shifts; RCWA matched.
Impact
Path to portable, affordable water sensing — 99%+ cost reduction vs. commercial GC-SPR.
Recognition & External Validation
Regeneron ISEF
Regeneron ISEF Finalist
Lockheed Martin
Lockheed Martin
Water Environment Association of Texas
Water Environment Assoc. of Texas
Office of Naval Research
Office of Naval Research
Stockholm Junior Water Prize
Stockholm Regional Junior Water Prize
Howmet Aerospace
Howmet Aerospace Foundation
Part 1 — The Problem

The water monitoring gap

Over 2 billion people lack safe water. Contaminated water causes 485,000 deaths annually from diarrhea alone. The barrier is not scientific knowledge — it is the cost and portability of detection tools.

Modern testing (ICP-MS, HPLC) requires specialized labs costing $20,000–$200,000. A single test runs $200–$500. This cost gap is what DiscSPR addresses.

Water contaminant explorer
Typical affected levels vs. WHO limits
Global water access crisis
% population without safe water — hover to explore
<10% lacking
10–35% lacking
35–60% lacking
>60% lacking
Part 2 — Our Innovation

Optical discs as sensor chips

SPR is a gold-standard optical technique used in top research labs worldwide. It detects molecules label-free by shining light on a metal surface and measuring how reflected light changes when something binds. The catch: systems cost $50,000–$200,000.

DiscSPR's core insight: commercial optical discs — Blu-ray (BD-R), DVD-R, CD-R — are already mass-manufactured precision nanoscale gratings for <$1 each. Coat them with silver, and you have a fully functional SPR sensor chip.

InputOptical disc

Factory grooves provide nanoscale periodic structure.

ModifyMetal coat

Ag or Cu creates the plasmon-supporting surface.

ExciteShine light

P-polarized light couples into the surface wave.

SenseDip shifts

RI changes move the resonance wavelength.

DeployWater monitor

Receptors make the signal contaminant-specific.

Traditional SPR vs. DiscSPR

Traditional Method Kretschmann Prism SPR
PRISM glass, n > 1.5 metal film (50 nm Ag) light in reflected
+Very well-established — decades of research.
Expensive and bulky. Precision prism, index-matching fluid, rotational stage, benchtop detector.
Complete system costs $50,000–$200,000. Single-use chips $200+.
DiscSPR Approach Grating-Coupled SPR (Optical Disc)
grating (optical disc grooves) period: 322–1582 nm · factory precision silver film on top of grooves light in reflected grooves supply momentum · no prism
+No prism needed. Periodic grooves supply the same momentum as the prism.
+Portable and flat. Chip the size of a stamp. Integrates with a smartphone spectrometer.
+Discs are perfect gratings — BD-R: 322 nm, DVD-R: 805 nm, CD-R: 1,582 nm period.
Grating-coupled SPR schematic
Figure 1Grating-coupled SPR: the prism is replaced by a periodic grating on the metal film. Polarized light couples into a surface plasmon wave, producing a reflectance dip that shifts when a molecule binds.
Disc groove comparison
Figure 2The three disc formats differ in groove spacing: BD-R (322 nm), DVD-R (805 nm), CD-R (1,582 nm). Smaller spacing = more data per disc. Same grooves, now used for sensing.
Part 3 — Physics Deep Dive

How Surface Plasmon Resonance works

Light cannot normally excite electrons on a metal surface because its momentum doesn't match. SPR is the condition where momentum does match, causing free electrons to collectively oscillate — an effect exquisitely sensitive to anything touching the surface.

01
Step 01
Evanescent wave forms
P-polarized light creates a decaying electromagnetic field extending ~200 nm beyond the metal surface.
02
Step 02
Momentum matching
Surface plasmon waves carry more momentum than free-space light. The disc grooves supply the missing momentum boost.
03
Step 03
Resonance
When the grating supplies exactly the right boost, photons couple into the plasmon mode — producing a sharp dip in reflectance.
04
Step 04
Dip shifts = signal
Binding a molecule changes the local refractive index, shifting the dip wavelength in proportion to concentration.
Why groove spacing matters: the momentum equation

The grating period (Λ) determines exactly how much momentum is added — which is why BD-R, DVD-R, and CD-R behave differently as sensors.

klight = (2π/λ) · nd · sinθ + m · (2π/Λ) = kSPP

The term m · (2π/Λ) is the momentum supplied by the disc grooves. BD-R (Λ = 322 nm) supplies large boosts; CD-R (Λ = 1,582 nm) supplies smaller boosts per order. This is why groove spacing is the fundamental design parameter.

Interactive: Zoom into disc grooves

Select a disc type and drag the zoom slider to explore the nanoscale groove structure. This is the geometry that makes SPR possible.

Disc groove cross-section — nanoscale view
Interactive zoom · AFM-verified geometry
Zoom: 1×
Groove period (Λ)
322
nm
Groove depth (hg)
23.9
nm ± 0.7
Sensitivity
321
nm/RIU
Part 4 — Detection Process

How a contaminant is detected

Step through the detection process from bare chip to binding event. Each stage changes the measured spectrum in a predictable, measurable way.

From bare disc to bound molecule
Click each stage to walk through the process
Stage 1: Bare metal establishes a baseline
The coated disc reflects light, with a sharp dip at the resonance wavelength (λres). This is the starting reference before any analyte is present. The grating grooves launch the surface plasmon wave.
Baseline resonance established
Stage 2: Bioreceptors attach to the surface
Capture molecules (antibodies, aptamers, or molecularly imprinted polymers) adsorb to the metal. Each receptor is designed to bind only one specific target. Attaching them slightly shifts the resonance — this becomes the new reference.
+Small shift from receptor layer
Stage 3: Water sample flows through the cell
The test sample is pumped through the 3D-printed microfluidic channel over the disc. The evanescent SPP field extends only ~200 nm above the metal, so only surface-bound molecules contribute to the signal — not bulk dissolved species.
Sample flowing, monitoring begins
Stage 4: Target molecules bind to receptors
A contaminant encounters its matching receptor and binds. Each binding event increases the local refractive index within the evanescent zone. SPR is sensitive to RI changes as small as 10-6 RIU — enabling detection of even femtomolar concentrations, in real time, with no labels or stains needed.
Real-time, label-free detection
Stage 5: Wavelength shift is measured as the signal
The final shift Δλ is proportional to the amount bound. The sensitivity S (nm/RIU) converts shift to concentration. For DiscSPR: CD-R achieves S = 394 nm/RIU (highest), BD-R achieves S = 321 nm/RIU (sharpest).
Δλ proportional to concentration
Signal simulator try a refractive-index change
1.92 nmpredicted wavelength shift
Small refractive-index changes near the sensor surface shift the SPR dip. That is the optical readout.
Simulated SPR sensorgram — resonance wavelength vs. time during a binding event Illustrative
Resonance wavelength
Part 5 — Materials & Methods

From optical disc to plasmonic sensor

Why this method matters

The build process is intentionally simple: start with a commercially available disc, expose the grating, add a thin plasmonic metal, then place it in a low-cost optical flow cell. This makes the engineering argument repeatable and accessible.

1
Step 01
Select and cut
BD-R, DVD-R, CD-R cut to 2.5 × 2.5 cm². Recordable (-R) media only — permanent grating embossing ensures structural consistency.
2
Step 02
Strip and clean
Metal/dye layers dissolved in 70% nitric acid (15 min for BD-R; 5 min for DVD/CD-R). Rinsed with IPA, cleaned by ultrasonic bath.
3
Step 03
Sputter coat
Ag or Cu (99.99% purity) deposited by magnetron sputtering at 40, 50, or 70 nm nominal thickness (Denton Vacuum Desktop Pro).
4
Step 04
Measure
Coated disc in 3D-printed PLA flow cell. Broadband p-polarized QTH light; AvaSpec spectrometer records reflectance at 30°–70° incidence angles.
Disc cutting
Figure 3Disc cutting process: discs sectioned to 2.5 × 2.5 cm² squares.
Disc cleaning
Figure 4Cleaning sequence: before and after 70% nitric acid treatment and sonication.
3D printed flow cell
Figure 5Custom 3D-printed SPR microfluidic device (Bambu Lab P1S, PLA). CAD model, cross-section, and front/back photographs.
AFM characterization
Figure 6AFM surface topography confirming grating parameters: BD-R Λ = 322 ± 5.2 nm, DVD-R Λ = 805 ± 7.5 nm, CD-R Λ = 1582 ± 13 nm.
DiscGrating period (Λ)Groove depth (hg)Metal continuity
BD-R322 ± 5.2 nm23.9 ± 0.7 nmContinuous (bridges grooves)
DVD-R805 ± 7.5 nm158.6 ± 2.2 nmLess continuous
CD-R1582 ± 13 nm151.8 ± 2.9 nmLess continuous
Disc substrates
Figure 7Disc grating substrates before sputtering and after Ag or Cu deposition, for all three disc types.
Measurement setup
Figure 8Home-built wavelength-modulation setup: QTH lamp, collimating and polarizing optics, motorized theta-2theta stage, AvaSpec fiber-coupled spectrometer. Apparatus cost approximately $200.
Part 6 — Results

Experimental results

Main result
Front-side, Ag-coated BD-R is the best overall platform.

CD-R achieved the highest numerical sensitivity, but BD-R produced the sharpest, cleanest resonance dips — making automated peak tracking more reliable in a deployed system.

BD-R Ag
Sharpest dip

Best-defined resonance profile; easiest to track reliably.

CD-R Ag
394 nm/RIU

Highest wavelength sensitivity with strong linearity.

DVD-R Ag
Middle option

Functional response, but less distinctive than BD-R or CD-R.

Best overall story: Use BD-R when resonance quality matters most; use CD-R when the largest wavelength shift is the priority.
Refractive index sensitivity, Ag-coated discs
Front-side illumination · 50° incidence · ethylene glycol/water (0–100% w/w)
CD-R
394 nm/RIU
R² = 0.990 · highest sensitivity
BD-R
321 nm/RIU
R² = 0.933 · sharpest dips
DVD-R
290 nm/RIU
R² = 0.998 · best linearity
DiscS (nm/RIU)Resonance qualityBest trait
CD-R3940.990Broad, overlapping modesHighest sensitivity
BD-R3210.933Sharp, well-definedBest resonance quality
DVD-R2900.998Moderate definitionBest linearity
Illumination geometry
Figure 9Illumination geometry: front-side mode (preferred) couples directly at the metal-water interface. Back-side mode traverses ~1 mm polycarbonate, introducing spectral distortions.
FRONT-SIDE ILLUMINATION (preferred)
Front-side Silver
Figure 10a — Front-side · Silver (Ag)Ag-coated BD-R, DVD-R, and CD-R at 40, 50, and 70 nm film thicknesses.
Front-side Copper
Figure 10b — Front-side · Copper (Cu)Cu-coated BD-R, DVD-R, and CD-R at 40, 50, and 70 nm film thicknesses.
BACK-SIDE ILLUMINATION
Back-side Silver
Figure 12a — Back-side · Silver (Ag)Back-side illumination produces more complex, less reproducible spectra.
Back-side Copper
Figure 12b — Back-side · Copper (Cu)Light traverses ~1 mm polycarbonate before reaching the metal surface.
SP dispersion plots
Figure 11Surface plasmon dispersion plots for Ag- and Cu-coated discs. Experimental resonance positions agree with RCWA-predicted SPP branches, confirming the plasmonic mechanism.
Presentation

Full slide deck

From problem to methods to results — the complete story in 12 slides.

Slide 1
Slide 2
Slide 3
Slide 4
Slide 5
Slide 6
Slide 7
Slide 8
Slide 9
Slide 10
Slide 11
Slide 12
1 / 12
Slide 1 of 12
Below: Discussion, cost analysis, research evaluation notes, future work, and glossary — the full research paper context.
Part 7 — Discussion

What the results mean

What is new?

DiscSPR uses the nanoscale groove patterns inside everyday optical discs as functional SPR gratings — reframing a mass-produced consumer material as a precision optical component. Previous grating-coupled SPR work has required custom-fabricated substrates. This work shows that the commercial disc manufacturing process already produces substrates with sufficient quality for plasmonic sensing.

How was it validated?

Three disc types (BD-R, DVD-R, CD-R), two metals (Ag and Cu), three film thicknesses (40, 50, 70 nm), two illumination geometries (front- and back-side), and RCWA simulations based on AFM-measured geometry were all compared. Resonance positions were confirmed to follow theoretical SPP dispersion curves, establishing the plasmonic — not merely optical — origin of the dips.

Why does it matter?

The approach reduces the cost barrier for SPR-based water sensing by more than 99%. The Flint, Michigan lead crisis — which affected over 100,000 people — illustrates the real-world scenario where affordable, deployable sensing could save lives. The path to a sub-$50 smartphone-coupled sensor is clear from this foundation.

What still needs work?

This study establishes the plasmonic platform — it does not yet demonstrate a finished contaminant-specific sensor. Next steps: adding selective surface chemistry (aptamers for lead, antibodies for microcystin), testing real water samples with known contaminant concentrations, stabilizing copper films against oxidation, and replacing the benchtop spectrometer with a smartphone readout.

Sensitivity vs. resonance sharpness

A fundamental tradeoff: CD-R's large grating period produces broader resonances with larger wavelength shifts (394 nm/RIU), while BD-R produces sharper, more reproducible dips at 321 nm/RIU. For analytical applications, front-side Ag-coated BD-R represents the optimal balance.

Silver outperforms copper

Silver's lower intrinsic optical loss produces cleaner resonances. Copper oxidizes in air, forming oxide surface layers that degrade performance. Protective coatings (graphene or MoS2) could stabilize Cu films in future iterations.

Cost metricDiscSPR (this work)Traditional GC-SPR
Grating substrate<$1 (optical disc)$100+ per chip
Materials per sensor unit~$4–7$200+
Complete sensing system~$200$50,000–$150,000
Deployment cost calculator
Compare DiscSPR vs. traditional GC-SPR for field deployment
50 sensors
10 sites
20% per year
DiscSPR total cost
$3,500
$200 apparatus/site + sensors + annual replacement
vs.
Traditional GC-SPR total cost
$1,100,000
$100k per apparatus + $200/chip replacement
Savings
$1,096,500
99.7% cost reduction
Abstract

Low-cost SPR sensing via optical disc gratings

More than 2 billion people lack access to safe drinking water. Current water monitoring methods require centralized laboratories and costly equipment, precluding routine monitoring in resource-limited environments. This research presents DiscSPR: a grating-coupled SPR (GC-SPR) platform using commercial BD-R, DVD-R, and CD-R optical discs as inexpensive substitutes for traditional plasmonic gratings. Discs were coated with 40–70 nm Ag or Cu by magnetron sputtering, assembled into 3D-printed microfluidic flow cells, and characterized by reflectance wavelength modulation validated against RCWA simulations. Ag-coated BD-R provided the sharpest resonances (321 nm/RIU); CD-R achieved the highest sensitivity (394 nm/RIU). Sensor material cost: under $10 per unit, versus $50,000–$150,000 for commercial GC-SPR.

Optical disc to sensor chip overview
Overview diagramOptical disc repurposed as a GC-SPR sensor chip: from commercial media to plasmonic sensor in four steps.
For Evaluators

How to evaluate this research

Three questions most research evaluators ask — answered directly.

1. Originality

The innovation is the substrate. Instead of fabricating a nanoscale grating from scratch, this project repurposes the precision groove pattern already present in commercial optical discs. This approach has not been systematically validated across multiple disc formats before.

2. Experimental rigor

Three disc types, two metals, three thicknesses, two illumination geometries were all compared, then each condition checked against RCWA simulations derived from AFM-measured grating geometry. This is not a one-condition demonstration.

3. Honest limitations

This work proves the SPR platform — not a finished toxin-specific product. Future work requires selective surface receptors, real-water validation with known spike concentrations, and miniaturization of the readout optics for field deployment.

Part 8 — Future Work

Next steps toward field deployment

01
Surface functionalization
Attach aptamers, antibodies, or molecularly imprinted polymers for selective detection of microcystin, atrazine, PFAS, and lead ions.
02
Copper stabilization
Graphene or MoS2 overlayers to prevent oxidation and extend Cu sensor lifetime in aqueous environments.
03
Smartphone readout
Replace benchtop spectrometer with smartphone-based spectral sensing to bring total apparatus cost below $50.
04
Prism-grating hybrid
Prism on substrate side to enhance back-side coupling for strongly absorbing or colored water samples.
05
Real water validation
Test in lake, groundwater, and tap water with known contaminant additions to establish practical detection limits.
06
Multiplexed detection
SPR imaging with multiple functionalized zones on one disc for simultaneous multi-toxin detection.
Conclusions

Summary

This work demonstrates the first systematic study of optical discs as GC-SPR substrates, validated by RCWA simulations derived from AFM measurements. Key results: (1) optical discs support GC-SPR excitation without any nanofabrication; (2) front-side Ag-coated BD-R gives the sharpest resonances and 321 nm/RIU sensitivity; (3) CD-R achieves the highest sensitivity at 394 nm/RIU; (4) silver outperforms copper; (5) front-side illumination is preferred across all substrates. Sensor material cost is under $10 per unit — more than 99% cheaper than commercial GC-SPR. DiscSPR demonstrates that optical disc SPR platforms can help close the gap between laboratory biosensing and affordable, deployable water monitoring.

Plain-English Glossary

Key terms for non-specialist readers

SPR
An optical effect where light excites electron waves on a thin metal surface, creating a measurable dip in reflected light.
Grating
A repeating nanoscale groove pattern. In this project, the grooves come from commercial optical discs.
RIU
Refractive Index Unit. A measure of how much a material bends light; SPR sensors track tiny changes in it.
Sensitivity
How many nanometers the resonance wavelength shifts per refractive-index change. Larger values mean stronger signal.
RCWA
A computational optics method used to simulate how light interacts with periodic structures like disc grooves.
Front-side illumination
Shining light directly on the metal-water interface — this produced the cleanest resonance spectra in this study.